Posts Tagged ‘visibility’

Cost Justifying a Traceability Solution

February 21st, 2010

Who’s going to pay for traceability?

That’s a common question in the food industry these days.  A senior director in a well-known food company told me recently, “No one will pay for traceability.”

Of course, a traceability system is going to have costs associated with it.  Initially there’s the cost of implementing a solution with equipment, software, services, and internal resources.   Ongoing costs add up for materials, system maintenance, and labour associated with additional process steps.

It’s not likely that the average consumer will be willing to pay extra for product that is traceable back to the source.  I don’t expect my wife at the grocery store to look at two similar packages of meat, for example, and say to herself, “Oh, this one’s traceable.  I’ll pay the extra price for it.”

Retailers likely won’t pay for it.  You know how it goes.  They’ll expect both traceability and lower prices.

So it appears that the costs of traceability, like so many other initiatives, will fall on the backs of the processors and manufacturers.

But it doesn’t have to be the case.  If things are done well, there is actually a pretty good deal available for the food processing companies.  (Just don’t let the other parties know.)

For the most part, the food industry could use a good shot in the arm to update their level of technology in order to achieve higher levels of productivity and lower production costs.  It’s time, and the increasing need for traceability may actually be a great tool to realize huge benefits.

While many expect companies to already have suitable internal traceability, what is all too common are manual systems based on paper files – even in 2010.  Plus in most companies’ operations there are gaps in the data chain, lack of real-time data visibility, and islands of technology.  Internal traceability?  Hardly.

The time for internal traceability in organizations is ripe.  And the potential benefits really are significant.

Internal traceability should not be embarked upon as a solution in itself.  It should, in fact, be seen as a by-product of a complete plant productivity solution that incorporates visibility and control tools.  With all product movements and transformations being monitored in real time, internal traceability will be one of the outputs of the right kind of system.

Here are some great benefits of implementing a complete internal traceability solution:

Area of Benefit Some “Top of List” Benefits
Brand protection Risk management with complete lot traceability
Labour reduction Automation, less time searching, counting
Productivity Visibility leads to better decisions and more efficient processes
Cost control Better management of raw materials, improved yields, production goal monitoring
Label control Central label design, approval process, database-driven product, nutritional, and ingredient details
Quality improvements Attribute checking, better stock rotation, lot control, quality checklists, SPC on piece weights, QA holds, process control
Better customer service More visibility of orders in real time, improved image, more accurate order fulfillment
Regulatory Compliance Food safety & quality, HACCP, record keeping, weights, labeling, nutritional & ingredient declaration, traceability (e.g. one-up, one-down)
Insurance Rapid detailed recall capabilities, support for limited recall scope, due diligence to help reduce litigation risk

Take a look at your organization in light of these potential benefits and see where you can find significant improvements.  It’s likely that you could easily cost justify the right solution that will offer many of these benefits.

Don’t focus on the costs of internal traceability.  Consider a full, detailed plant productivity solution that gives complete real-time visibility of products and events, and internal traceability will be one of the built-in deliverables.  Implement a technology solution for in-plant benefits that will pay for itself.

Stay tuned.  We’ll review the many components of an Internal Traceability solution and how they produce benefits.

Welcome

January 19th, 2010

Welcome to the official blog of Carlisle Technology!

Why are we doing this?And why now?

We have a lot to say.

  • We’ve been in business for 25 years, and serving the food industry for 22 years of that. We’ve seen incredible advancements in technology, and we’ve been at the forefront of more than a few of these developments, such as standardized bar codes, touch-industrial workstations, and integrated internal traceability systems.
  • The food industry is changing faster than ever before. Food safety is now a major concern among consumers, as they are being inundated with reports of recalls in the media.  And it’s not just FUD media (Fear Uncertainty and Doubt). Consumers are starting to grasp how incredibly complex our global  food supply chain is, and with that complexity comes added risk. Brands are built on trust, and consumers are willing to pay extra for brands that remove the uncertainty of food safety.
  • Niche product categories are expanding, and food processors that address these will be rewarded. Organic foods, locally grown foods, medicine-free meats, allergen-free foods, sustainably grown foods, and animal welfare protected foods are all areas of focus. But will consumers trust that product labeled as medicine-free really is? Integrated food processors should have visibility to ensure compliance, but comprehensive tracking systems that would allow this are still rare. And non-integrated processors must work on interoperable traceability systems to provide this visibility.
  • Governments are responding to consumer demands, and are busy enacting new regulations that will affect the food supply chain.
  • Labels must include the Country of Origin; Nutritional information must be compliant with standards; Allergenic information must be prominent; — All this added complexity requires a regimented label design and approval process to ensure food processors are onside with the law.
  • Traceability requirements of the entire food supply chain is being expanded. The FDA Bioterrorism Act of 2002 requires one-up and one-down traceability, but this is only a start.  New regulations are expected to be passed in 2010 that will increase traceability demands
  • Food processors are justifiably concerned about who will pay for this. For some, this will be the cost of doing business. For some, they will be able to provide added value to consumers, and will be able to capture some of this. And for others, they will reap productivity gains by using the added information provided by their traceability systems.

We’re excited about the prospects of the food industry. We love solving problems. And we already have great solutions to address productivity, visibility, and traceability.

Through this blog, you’ll gain some of our insights into events that are changing the industry, hear about some of our experiences in addressing them, and understand how to extract value from traceability solutions.

We hope you follow along!